Subject	I see.. Well either i think you may have bad o2`s that
Posted by	kickerzx on December 18, 2009 at 5:30 PM
	This message has been viewed 104 times.
In Reply To	I agree with kickerzx ...... posted by zx299 on December 18, 2009 at 03:27 PM
Message	thinks the AFR ratio is leaner than it really is. The ecu does not use info from the lambdas before the engine is hot, so this condition would cause this kind of trouble. Or The chip you got does not fit YOUR engine. Honsetly i would skip chips alltogether (as they are not more that a best guess kind of thing) and go for something mappable. Like the Nistune. Or a full standalone. But avoid AEM. I would recomend a Vi-pec.
Follow Ups	Which System Faults will make the ECU take over the timing - MaxxAction 08:45:33 12/18/09 Did you do any work on the car before this happend? - kickerzx 13:40:16 12/18/09 BTW. The timing numbers change because - kickerzx 13:46:12 12/18/09 Re: BTW. The timing numbers change because - MaxxAction 15:00:21 12/18/09 Re: Did you do any work on the car before this happend? - MaxxAction 14:56:08 12/18/09 I agree with kickerzx ...... - zx299 15:27:03 12/18/09 I see.. Well either i think you may have bad o2`s that - kickerzx 17:30:15 12/18/09 Re: I see.. Well either i think you may have bad o2`s that - MaxxAction 18:09:01 12/18/09 ok. In that case i picture a scenario where it ran good.. - kickerzx 18:14:01 12/18/09 Which again leads me to a chip that dont fit your setup (n/m) - kickerzx 18:17:51 12/18/09 O2 sensors play NO part in idle..... - zx299 19:22:39 12/18/09 i don't disagree with you but can you please explain why - surfer31337 00:02:01 12/19/09 No thats not correct. O2`s DO play a role at idle. - kickerzx 05:50:38 12/19/09 Look at the pics of the maps on Ash`s site. - kickerzx 05:55:22 12/19/09 Incorrect....... - zx299 15:00:43 12/19/09 Hm. I am on the verge of giving you this one. - kickerzx 17:26:13 12/19/09
Post a Followup	You cannot reply to this message because you are not logged in.